EBT = Electronic Beam Tomography = Elektronenstrahltomographie
CT verfahren zur Beurteilung der Koronargefäße und des Herzens mit sehr hoher örtlicher und zeitlicher Auflösung. Im Gegensatz zum normalen CT gibt es keine rotierende Röhre.
Einsatz
Gut geeignet:
Nicht gut geeignet:
Fraglich sinnvoll
Wo ?
Medizinische Klinik II mit Poliklinik, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität
Erlangen-Nürnberg, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 29, D-91054 Erlangen
Abteilung Prof Daniels , verantwortlich ist Prof Moshage und , Dr.Achenbach
Tel
email: Gerd.Muschiol@rzmail.uni-erlangen.de
Internetadresse :
Weitere Internetadressen:
http://194.118.11.31/cgi-bin/closed/pan_news.cgi?S:981097710
http://www.imatron-web.com/imbiol.htm
http://www.heartinfo.com/schem2.html
http://www.herzdiagnostik.de/index.htm
http://www.bnk.de/herz/herzinh/herz96_2.htm
Wie ?
Vorteile :
Probleme:
Bewertung:
sehr gute Methode , die zu wenig von den Firmen und den Kassen gefördert wird.
gut dokumentiert an mehreren Tausend Patienten
Privat Kassen bezahlen die Untersuchung
Orginaltexte:
M. Sones, 1978:
"Ein Drittel der Patienten stirbt an Komplikationen der KHK, bevor wir überhaupt wissen, dass die Menschen krank und somit gefährdet sind. Das wichtigste Problem, vor dem wir stehen, ist die Identifizierung dieser Menschen.
Ziel ist die Entwicklung einer nicht-invasiven Methode, um die koronare Arteriosklerose in ihrem frühesten Entwicklungsstadium zu identifizieren."
Zeitschrift für Kardiologie
Abstract Volume 87 Issue 7 (1998) pp 522-527
Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Elektronenstrahltomographie
Potentials and limitations of electron beam computed tomography (EBCT)
W. Moshage, S. Achenbach, K. Bachmann
Medizinische Klinik II mit Poliklinik, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität
Erlangen-Nürnberg, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 29, D-91054 Erlangen
Im Gegensatz zur konventionellen Computertomographie (CT) rotiert bei der Elektronenstrahltomographie (EBT) keine Röntgenröhre mechanisch um den Patienten, sondern es wird ein Elektronenstrahl auf semizirkulär um den Patienten angeordnete Targets gelenkt, an denen dann die eigentliche Röntgenstrahlung entsteht.
Mit dieser ultraschnellen Technik ist es möglich geworden, axiale Schnittbilder des Herzens in 50 bzw. 100 ms zu erzeugen und mit einer Ortsauflösung <0,5 mm2 sämtliche Strukturen des Herzens präzise abzubilden. Die Akquisition von 30-40 axialen, EKG-getriggerten Schnittbildern (Schichtdicken 2-3 mm) im kurzen Atemstillstand erlaubt die komplette, dreidimensionale Abbildung des Herzens eines Patienten. Die Gesamtmeßzeiten liegen zwischen 30 und 50 s. Auch wenn mit der EBT eine vollständige Beurteilung der Morphologie und der Funktion des Herzens bis hin zur Messung der Myokardperfusion möglich ist, liegt doch der wesentliche Vorteil der Methode in der nichtinvasiven Beurteilung der Koronararterien.
Ohne Gabe von Kontrastmittel können in den einzelnen axialen Schnitten auch geringe Koronarkalzifizierungen exakt quantifiziert werden. Der Nachweis von Koronarkalk mit der EBT muß als der derzeit empflindlichste nichtinvasive Marker für das Vorliegen einer koronaren Atheromatose einschließlich ihrer Frühformen angesehen werden.
Die peripher-venöse Kontrastmittelgabe während der Datenakquisition erlaubt zudem eine Darstellung von Koronargefäßinnenlumina einschließlich signifikanter Stenosierungen. Die Methode eignet sich insbesondere zur Beurteilung des Verlaufs nach Angioplastie und aortokoronarer Bypass-Operation. Die wesentlichen Probleme und Grenzen der Methode sind unter der Voraussetzung eines stabilen Sinusrhythmus in Atem- und Bewegungsartefakten sowie Überlagerung der Koronararterien durch Venen und durch ausgeprägte Koronarkalzifizierungen zu sehen. Trotzdem sind bereits bisher mit der EBT klinisch beurteilbare, nichtinvasive Darstellungen von Koronararterien möglich geworden, die durch einen weiteren technischen Fortschritt möglicherweise noch optimiert werden können.
Schlüsselwörter Elektronenstrahltomographie - ultraschnelles CT - Koronarkalzifizierung - koronare Herzerkrankung - nichtinvasive Koronardiagnostik
Article in PDF-Format (629 KB) Online publication: August 3, 1998 © Steinkopff Verlag 1998
The New England Journal of Medicine -- December 31, 1998 -- Vol. 339, No. 27
Value of Electron-Beam Computed Tomography for the Noninvasive Detection of High-Grade Coronary-Artery Stenoses and Occlusions
Stephan Achenbach, Werner Moshage, Dieter Ropers, Jorg Nossen, Werner G. Daniel
Abstract
Background. Reliable noninvasive assessment of coronary-artery stenoses and occlusions would constitute an advantage in the care of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. We investigated the accuracy of contrast-enhanced electron-beam computed tomography (CT) for the detection of high-grade coronary-artery stenoses and occlusions.
Methods. Electron-beam CT was performed in 125 patients. After intravenous injection of a contrast agent, 40 cross-sectional images of the heart were acquired during inspiration, triggered by the electrocardiogram in diastole. Three-dimensional reconstructions of the heart and coronary arteries were rendered to facilitate evaluation of the images. The proximal and middle segments of the major coronary arteries were evaluated for the presence or absence of high-grade stenoses and occlusions. The results were compared with those of invasive coronary angiography in a blinded fashion.
Results. Because of technical problems that impaired the quality of the images, 124 (25 percent) of the 500 coronary arteries studied (left main, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary) in a total of 125 patients were excluded from evaluation. No vessels could be evaluated in 19 patients (15 percent), and another 28 patients (22 percent) had one, two, or three vessels that could not be evaluated. In the remaining coronary arteries with adequate image quality, electron-beam CT permitted visualization of 69 of 75 high-grade stenoses and occlusions (sensitivity, 92 percent), whereas in 282 of 301 arteries, the absence of high-grade stenoses and occlusions was correctly detected (specificity, 94 percent).
Conclusions. When image quality is adequate, electron-beam CT may be useful to detect or rule out high-grade coronary-artery stenoses and occlusions. (N Engl J Med 1998;339:1964-71.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annually, more than 1 million coronary angiographic procedures are performed in the United States. (1) Replacing even a fraction of these diagnostic procedures with a noninvasive imaging technique would constitute an important advance in the care of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Several noninvasive imaging techniques have the potential for visualization of the coronary arteries, including transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, (2,3,4,5,6) synchrotron dichromography, (7,8) and most important, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). (9,10,11) However, because of limited spatial, temporal, or contrast resolution, none of these techniques have permitted reliable detection of coronary-artery stenoses and occlusions in a clinical setting.
Electron-beam computed tomography (CT) is a cross-sectional imaging technique with high spatial and temporal resolution; it is possible for image acquisition to be triggered by the patient's electrocardiogram. The technique is therefore well suited to cardiac imaging. It is widely used to assess coronary calcifications, (12,13,14,15,16,17,18) and there have been preliminary reports of the use of electron-beam CT with intravenous injection of contrast agent to visualize the coronary-artery lumen. (19,20,21,22,23,24,25) We prospectively evaluated a group of 125 patients by both electron-beam CT and conventional coronary angiography to determine the value of the method for the noninvasive detection of high-grade stenoses and occlusions of the coronary arteries.
Methods
Subjects
One hundred twenty-five patients (104 men and 21 women) were studied. Their mean age was 56 years (range, 23 to 82). Their average weight was 81 kg, but nine patients weighed more than 100 kg. All patients who were admitted to our institution for inpatient diagnostic coronary angiography on days on which we had access to the electron-beam CT scanner (a total of 44 days) were asked to participate in the study. Patients with coronary stents or coronary-artery bypass grafts, patients whose clinical condition was unstable, patients with atrial fibrillation, and patients with contraindications to the administration of contrast agent were excluded. All patients gave written informed consent according to institutional guidelines. Conventional invasive coronary angiography was performed by independent investigators within one week after the electron-beam CT investigation. All selected patients were included in the analysis.
Electron-Beam CT
Acquisition of Data
Electron-beam CT has previously been described in detail. (26,27) In brief, the unique feature of this CT method is its very high imaging speed (one image can be acquired in 50 to 100 msec), which can be achieved because there is no rotating x-ray tube. The heart can therefore be imaged with substantially less artifact due to motion than with conventional CT scanners. In addition, scanning can be triggered by the patient's electrocardiogram. In our study, data were acquired with a C-150 XP electron-beam CT scanner (Imatron, South San Francisco, Calif.). Scanning was performed with the patient in a supine position and holding his or her breath after inspiration. Our imaging protocol consisted of three steps, as described below.
To determine the position of the heart, eight cross-sectional images of the chest (slice thickness, 7 mm; 4-mm gap between slices; field of view, 15 cm; acquisition time, 50 msec) were acquired simultaneously with the scanner in the multislice mode.
To determine exactly the transit time of the contrast agent from injection into an antecubital vein to the appearance of contrast enhancement in the aortic root and coronary arteries, a bolus of 10 ml of contrast agent (Ultravist-370 [iopromide], Schering, Berlin, Germany) was injected at a rate of 4 ml per second. As injection of the contrast agent was begun, the patient was instructed to breathe in, breathe out, breathe in again, and then hold the breath in inspiration. This sequence of commands was timed to have a total duration of 10 seconds. With the onset of breath-holding, 10 seconds after the start of contrast injection, acquisition of 10 axial cross-sectional images at the level of the aortic root was begun (single-slice mode; slice thickness, 3 mm; acquisition time, 100 msec per image). Image acquisition was triggered by the electrocardiogram, with an image being acquired after every other heartbeat at 80 percent of the RR interval. The average CT density in the aortic root was measured in each of the 10 acquired images with the scanner software. The interval between the onset of contrast injection and peak enhancement was considered to represent the transit time of the contrast agent.
In a final step, 40 axial cross-sectional images of the heart were acquired in single-slice mode. The acquisition time was 100 msec per image. With acquisition triggered by the electrocardiogram, one image was acquired after every heartbeat in diastole (at 80 percent of the cardiac cycle). The slice thickness was 3 mm, and after the acquisition of each image, the table was advanced 2 mm to generate overlapping images. The field of view was 15 cm, with an image matrix of 512 by 512, which generated a pixel size of 0.29 by 0.29 mm to make full use of the in-plane spatial resolution of the scanner (seven line pairs per centimeter).
Images were acquired with the patient holding his or her breath after inspiration and with breathing commands identical to those used for the determination of the transit time of the contrast agent. The scanner permits the acquisition of one image per cardiac cycle for heart rates up to 120 beats per minute. With heart rates between 44 and 104 beats per minute (mean, 69) during acquisition of the images, the duration of breath-holding was 23 to 54 seconds (mean, 35). Between 120 and 160 ml of contrast agent was injected intravenously at a rate of 4 ml per second. A delay corresponding to the individually determined transit time of the contrast agent was maintained between the initiation of injection of the contrast agent and the acquisition of the first image. The radiation dose was estimated to be less than 11 mSv. (12,28)
Evaluation of Data
The images obtained by electron-beam CT were independently evaluated by two investigators without knowledge of the findings on the patients' coronary angiograms. The image data were transferred to an off-line workstation (MagicView, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The cross-sectional images were screened for artifacts caused by motion and for calcifications of the coronary arteries. Calcifications were rated as too severe to permit further evaluation if a calcified plaque occupied more than half the diameter of the artery in two consecutive images. Manual segmentation of the images was performed on an image-by-image basis to eliminate all structures that would obstruct the view of the coronary arteries, such as the chest wall, pulmonary vessels, and atrial appendages (Figure 1). Subsequently, three-dimensional reconstructions of the heart and coronary arteries were rendered by a shaded-surface display technique. A lower threshold of 80 Hounsfield units was used for the reconstruction in all patients to visualize selectively the contrast-enhanced lumina of the coronary arteries, while ignoring the vessel wall and surrounding connective tissue (Figure 1). (19) Three-dimensional reconstructions were rendered interactively from at least six angles (equivalent to posteroanterior, left anterior oblique, and right anterior oblique projections, each in at least two craniocaudal angulations). If necessary, reconstructions were rendered from additional angles to depict all coronary segments from two orthogonal directions.
On the basis of the original cross-sectional images and the three-dimensional reconstructions, both investigators independently rated the left main coronary artery (segment 5 according to the system of the American Heart Association (29)) and the proximal and middle segments of the left anterior descending coronary artery (segments 6 and 7 and the first half of segment 8), the left circumflex coronary artery (segments 11 and 13), and the right coronary artery (segments 1 and 2) as being occluded or having a high-grade stenosis (more than 75 percent reduction in diameter), showing neither high-grade stenosis nor occlusion, or being impossible to evaluate. The side branches and the distal segments of the coronary arteries were not included in the evaluation. Determination of the severity of stenosis was based on visual estimation of both the axial cross sections and the three-dimensional reconstructions. In the reconstructions, the severity of the lesion was determined in the projection that showed the highest degree of stenosis. Cohen's kappa (30) was calculated to determine agreement between observers on which of three categories was applicable (status impossible to evaluate, high-grade stenosis or occlusion absent, and high-grade stenosis or occlusion present).
Figure 1: Electron-Beam CT Images of the Heart.
Panel A shows a cross section of the heart at the level of the aortic root. The origin of the left main coronary artery from the aortic root as well as the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (arrow) and left circumflex coronary artery (arrowhead) can be seen. Panel B and Panel C show a three-dimensional reconstruction (shaded-surface display) of the heart and coronary arteries. The reconstruction is designed to show only contrast-enhanced structures. Panel B shows a reconstruction of the complete heart. In Panel C, the main stem of the pulmonary artery and the atrial appendages have been removed to show the left main coronary artery (LM), the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), and the right coronary artery (RCA).
Panel A:
Panel B:
Panel C:
Coronary Angiography
In all patients, coronary angiography was performed by the transfemoral Judkins approach. Angiograms were documented on cine film and evaluated by two cardiologists who were independent of the electron-beam CT team. Reductions in diameter of more than 75 percent were considered to represent high-grade stenoses. In cases of disagreement between the two readers, agreement was achieved in a joint reading. Cohen's kappa was calculated to determine variability between observers, with regard to the same categories as for electron-beam CT (status impossible to evaluate, high-grade stenosis or occlusion absent, and high-grade stenosis or occlusion present).
Results
In all the patients, electron-beam CT was performed without complications. The mean time needed for the investigation was 18±3 minutes per patient, including all preparations for scanning. Of the 500 coronary arteries (left main, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary artery in 125 patients), 124 were considered impossible to evaluate because of technical problems. The main reasons for impaired image quality were artifacts of respiration (40 vessels) and severe calcifications (33 vessels) (Figure 2), as well as artifacts of movement of the left circumflex coronary artery (11 vessels) and the right coronary artery (14 vessels). Other reasons included reduced signal-to-noise ratio (12 vessels), superposition of veins (5 vessels), malpositioning of the imaging volume (5 vessels), and a very small arterial lumen (4 vessels). In 11 patients, one coronary artery could not be evaluated; in 14 patients, two arteries could not be evaluated; and in 3 patients, three vessels could not be evaluated. In 19 patients (15 percent), the quality of the image was too poor for any of the four arteries to be evaluated. The reduction in image quality in these patients was caused by artifacts of respiration in eight, severe calcifications in five, reduced signal-to-noise ratio in three, and more than one of these factors in three.
The left main coronary artery could be evaluated in 105 patients (84 percent), the left anterior descending coronary artery in 100 patients (80 percent), the left circumflex coronary artery in 83 patients (66 percent), and the right coronary artery in 88 patients (70 percent).
Figure 2: Frequently Observed Reasons for Inability to Evaluate Electron-Beam CT Images of the Coronary Arteries.
Panel A shows severe calcifications of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (arrow). In Panel B, artifacts of respiration render the left anterior descending coronary artery (arrow), left circumflex coronary artery (arrowhead), and right coronary artery (not seen from this angle) impossible to evaluate.
Panel A:
Panel B:
With the 124 coronary arteries that were graded as impossible to evaluate excluded from the analysis, 41 of 42 substantial lesions (high-grade stenoses and occlusions) of the left anterior descending coronary artery, 14 of 18 substantial lesions of the left circumflex coronary artery, and 14 of 15 substantial lesions of the right coronary artery were correctly detected by electron-beam CT (Figure 3 and Figure 4). In the arteries that could be evaluated, the absence of high-grade stenosis or complete occlusion was correctly determined in 104 of 105 cases for the left main coronary artery, 51 of 58 cases for the left anterior descending coronary artery, 57 of 65 cases for the left circumflex coronary artery, and 70 of 73 cases for the right coronary artery (Table 1). These numbers correspond to a sensitivity of 92 percent, a specificity of 94 percent, a positive predictive value of 78 percent, and a negative predictive value of 98 percent for the detection of substantial coronary lesions in the arteries that could be evaluated.
Figure 3:
Cardiac Images of a 56-Year-Old Patient with a Complete Occlusion of the Left Circumflex Coronary Artery (Arrow) According to Electron-Beam CT (Panel A) and Coronary Angiography (Panel B).
Panel A:
Panel B:
Whether a vessel could be evaluated by electron-beam CT was not associated with the angiographic results for that vessel (Table 2). Of the 376 vessels that could be evaluated by electron-beam CT, 75 (20 percent) had a high-grade stenosis or occlusion on angiography; of the 124 arteries that could not be evaluated by electron-beam CT, 24 (19 percent) had a high-grade stenosis or occlusion on angiography.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Figure 4: Cardiac Images of an 81-Year-Old Patient with a High-Grade Stenosis of the Right Coronary Artery (Arrow) According to Electron-Beam CT (Panel A and Panel B) and Coronary Angiography (Panel C).
Panel A:
Panel C:
Overall, when arteries that could not be evaluated were included, electron-beam CT permitted visualization of 69 of the 99 high-grade coronary-artery stenoses and occlusions that were detected by angiography in the group of patients we investigated. Of the 401 coronary arteries that were documented by angiography to be free of high-grade lesions, 282 were correctly identified by electron-beam CT.
Interobserver agreement was achieved for 453 of the 500 coronary arteries (91 percent). Cohen's kappa was 0.82, indicating close agreement between observers. Disagreement concerned mainly the quality of the images: in 31 of the 47 coronary vessels with discrepant readings, one of the two observers considered image quality to be too poor for evaluation. With conventional angiography, agreement between the observers was achieved in 96 percent of cases without joint reading, and Cohen's kappa was 0.90.
Whether a vessel could be evaluated by electron-beam CT was not associated with the angiographic results for that vessel (Table 2). Of the 376 vessels that could be evaluated by electron-beam CT, 75 (20 percent) had a high-grade stenosis or occlusion on angiography; of the 124 arteries that could not be evaluated by electron-beam CT, 24 (19 percent) had a high-grade stenosis or occlusion on angiography.
Overall, when arteries that could not be evaluated were included, electron-beam CT permitted visualization of 69 of the 99 high-grade coronary-artery stenoses and occlusions that were detected by angiography in the group of patients we investigated. Of the 401 coronary arteries that were documented by angiography to be free of high-grade lesions, 282 were correctly identified by electron-beam CT.
Interobserver agreement was achieved for 453 of the 500 coronary arteries (91 percent). Cohen's kappa was 0.82, indicating close agreement between observers. Disagreement concerned mainly the quality of the images: in 31 of the 47 coronary vessels with discrepant readings, one of the two observers considered image quality to be too poor for evaluation. With conventional angiography, agreement between the observers was achieved in 96 percent of cases without joint reading, and Cohen's kappa was 0.90.
Discussion
Because of its high spatial and temporal resolution as well as the fact that image acquisition can be triggered by the electrocardiogram, electron-beam CT is well suited for cardiac imaging. In a clinical setting, this method, which has also been called "ultrafast CT" or "cine CT," has been applied principally to visualize and quantify coronary calcifications (12,13,14,15,16,17) and to evaluate cardiac function. (31) However, preliminary reports have indicated the potential of the method, after intravenous injection of contrast agent, to visualize the coronary-artery lumen (19,20) and to detect stenoses noninvasively. (21,22,23,24,25) In our investigation, we found a high sensitivity and specificity, as well as a very high negative predictive value of 98 percent, for the detection of complete occlusions and high-grade stenoses of the coronary arteries, provided that sufficiently good image quality could be obtained. In the vessels that could be evaluated, the number of false negative results for stenoses was small (92 percent sensitivity). Most stenoses that were missed were located in the left circumflex and right coronary arteries. These vessels are perpendicular to the imaging plane and are therefore visualized with lower spatial resolution than those oriented parallel to the imaging plane. As in earlier, smaller studies, most false positive results were for stenoses in smaller vessels (23) (again, the left circumflex coronary artery in most cases).
The main drawback of electron-beam CT currently seems to be that 25 percent of all coronary segments had to be excluded from evaluation because of inadequate image quality. Because of their position in the coronary groove, the left circumflex and right coronary arteries have more rapid diastolic motion than the left anterior descending coronary artery. The motion is caused mainly by atrial contraction during end-diastole. In addition, the interpretation of results for all coronary arteries may be compromised by artifacts of respiration if patients are unable to obey the breath-holding commands. Although mildly calcified vessels can be evaluated, extensive calcifications are a frequent reason for false negative (23,25) and false positive (22) results. We therefore excluded all arteries with more than mild calcifications from evaluation. Mistriggering of single cross sections (from premature beats, for example) was not observed as frequently as previously reported. (22)
Before the method is applied on a broad clinical scale, the number of studies that cannot be evaluated will have to be reduced. To do this, it will be necessary to ensure, for example, that through more careful instruction and preparation patients hold their breath for the full scanning period. Alternatively, the heart rate may be medically increased to shorten the overall image-acquisition time. Furthermore, choosing different imaging planes could increase spatial resolution in the vessel segments that are perpendicular to the axial imaging plane we used in the present study (the middle right coronary artery and the left circumflex coronary artery). (23) Further reducing the image-acquisition time or optimizing the time interval in the cardiac cycle that is used for image acquisition would probably diminish artifacts of motion. Higher spatial resolution of the scanner might improve the detection of short lesions and of stenoses in small arteries. It might also permit the development of image-processing techniques to subtract calcified plaques, something that is currently not possible, because of the overlap of density values between calcifications and contrast-enhanced vessel lumen.
Our evaluation was limited to the proximal and middle segments of the major coronary arteries. Distal segments and side branches were excluded because their small diameters do not permit reliable imaging with the spatial resolution the scanner currently provides (seven line pairs per centimeter in the imaging plane), and partial-volume effects would lead to an unacceptably high number of false positive results. However, since lesions in distal segments and side branches are rarely the target of catheter intervention or bypass revascularization, the fact that electron-beam CT imaging is limited to segments of larger diameter does not mean that the technique may not be clinically useful. Similarly, no attempt was made to differentiate between high-grade stenoses and complete occlusions of coronary arteries. In electron-beam CT, the partial-volume effect can cause a very tight stenosis to appear to be a complete occlusion of the vessel lumen. Consequently, it may be impossible to decide whether such a lesion represents a high-grade stenosis or a complete occlusion with filling of the distal segment by collateral flow. For clinical applications, however, mistaking complete occlusions for high-grade stenoses would in most cases be irrelevant, since both conditions usually require further invasive testing.
The accuracy of electron-beam CT for the diagnosis of high-grade stenoses and occlusions of the coronary arteries seems to be superior to that of other noninvasive techniques. Echocardiography permits the assessment of only the most proximal segments of the coronary arteries, and the technique is unreliable for identifying coronary lesions. Dichromatic synchrotron angiography has not yet been evaluated on a broad scale. Magnetic resonance coronary-angiography techniques are evolving rapidly. As compared with electron-beam CT, they have the advantage of requiring no exposure to radiation and, in most cases, no injection of contrast agent. However, the spatial and temporal resolution of currently available MRI techniques (32,33,34,35,36,37) is inferior to that of electron-beam CT, and except for respiratory-gated acquisitions, (36,37) the necessary respiratory maneuvers require a high degree of cooperation from patients. (32,33,34,35) The reported accuracy of MRI protocols that have been proposed for the detection of coronary-artery stenoses varies widely, from 38 to 90 percent, (32,33,34,35,36,37) and (with the possible exception of visualizing the course of anomalous coronary arteries (38,39,40)) magnetic resonance angiography is currently considered an investigational technique. (10,11,40,41)
The high negative predictive value of electron-beam CT for the detection of high-grade stenoses in patients with adequate image quality may make this method a clinically useful test. Since we found that the results of electron-beam CT could be completely evaluated in 62 percent of all patients, and that whether or not they could be evaluated was not related to the angiographic status of the arteries, it can be calculated that up to two thirds of the coronary angiographic procedures that demonstrate normal coronary arteries could currently be averted by the use of this noninvasive test. Further research must be directed toward reducing the number of nondiagnostic studies. Once this goal has been achieved, electron-beam CT may become a useful tool to rule out high-grade coronary-artery stenoses or occlusions in, for example, patients with a low likelihood of obstructive coronary disease, and also in patients who have undergone balloon angioplasty or bypass grafting. In this way, a substantial number of the invasive coronary angiographic studies that have negative results, which constitute up to 20 percent of all studies performed, (42) could be replaced by noninvasive outpatient examinations.
Source Information
From the Department of Internal Medicine II, University of Erlangen-Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany. Address reprint requests to Dr. Achenbach at the Medizinische Klinik II mit Poliklinik, Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg, Ostliche Stadtmauerstr. 29, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany.
References1. 1993 Heart and stroke facts statistics. Dallas: American Heart Association, 1993:8.
Return to Text
2. Hozumi T, Yoshida K, Ogata Y, et al. Noninvasive assessment of significant left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis by coronary flow velocity reserve with transthoracic color Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 1998;97:1557-62.
Return to Text
3. Feigenbaum H. Transthoracic ultrasonic visualization of coronary atherosclerosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989;2:253-8.
Return to Text
4. Tardif JC, Vannan MA, Taylor K, Schwartz SL, Pandian NG. Delineation of extended lengths of coronary arteries by multiplane transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:909-19.
Return to Text
5. Caiati C, Aragona P, Iliceto S, Rizzon P. Improved detection of proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis after intravenous injection of a lung-crossing contrast agent: a transesophageal Doppler echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:1413-21.
Return to Text
6. Mulvagh SL, Foley DA, Aeschbacher BC, Klarich KK, Seward JB. Second harmonic imaging of an intravenously administered echocardiographic contrast agent: visualization of coronary arteries and measurement of coronary blood flow. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:1519-25.
Return to Text
7. Rubenstein E, Brown GS, Chapman D, et al. Synchrotron radiation coronary angiography in humans. In: Chance B, Deisenhofer J, Ebashi S, et al., eds. Synchrotron radiation in the biosciences. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994:639-50.
Return to Text
8. Hamm CW, Meinertz T, Dix WR, et al. Intravenous coronary angiography with dichromography using synchrotron radiation. Herz 1996;21:127-31.
Return to Text
9. Manning WJ, Edelman RR. Magnetic resonance coronary angiography. Magn Reson Q 1993;9:131-51.
Return to Text
10. Taylor AM, Pennell DJ. Recent advances in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Curr Opin Cardiol 1996;11:635-42.
Return to Text
11. van der Wall EE, van Rugge FP, Vliegen HW, Reiber JH, de Roos A, Bruschke AV. Ischemic heart disease: value of MR techniques. Int J Card Imaging 1997;13:79-89.
Return to Text
12. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:827-32.
Return to Text
13. Ultrafast CT for coronary calcification. Lancet 1991;337:1449-50.
Return to Text
14. Breen JF, Sheedy PF II, Schwartz RS, et al. Coronary artery calcification detected with ultrafast CT as an indication of coronary artery disease. Radiology 1992;185:435-9.
Return to Text
15. Budoff MJ, Georgiou D, Brody A, et al. Ultrafast computed tomography as a diagnostic modality in the detection of coronary artery disease: a multicenter study. Circulation 1996;93:898-904.
Return to Text
16. Arad Y, Spadaro LA, Goodman K, et al. Predictive value of electron beam computed tomography of the coronary arteries: 19-month follow-up of 1173 asymptomatic subjects. Circulation 1996;93:1951-3.
Return to Text
17. Detrano R, Hsiai T, Wang S, et al. Prognostic value of coronary calcification and angiographic stenoses in patients undergoing coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:285-90.
Return to Text
18. Rumberger JA, Sheedy PF II, Breen JF, Fitzpatrick LA, Schwartz RS. Electron beam computed tomography and coronary artery disease: scanning for coronary artery calcification. Mayo Clin Proc 1996;7:369-77.
Return to Text
19. Moshage WE, Achenbach S, Seese B, Bachmann K, Kirchgeorg M. Coronary artery stenoses: three-dimensional imaging with electrocardiographically triggered, contrast agent-enhanced, electron-beam CT. Radiology 1995;196:707-14.
Return to Text
20. Chernoff DM, Ritchie CJ, Higgins CB. Evaluation of electron beam CT coronary angiography in healthy subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:93-9.
Return to Text
21. Budoff MJ, Oudiz RJ, Zalace CP, et al. Intravenous three dimensional coronary angiography using contrast enhanced electron beam computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:Suppl A:393A. abstract.
Return to Text
22. Nakanishi T, Ito K, Imazu M, Yamakido M. Evaluation of coronary artery stenoses using electron-beam CT and multiplanar reformation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21:121-7.
Return to Text
23. Schmermund A, Rensing BJ, Sheedy PF, Bell MR, Rumberger JA. Intravenous electron-beam computed tomographic coronary angiography for segmental analysis of coronary artery stenoses. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:1547-54.
Return to Text
24. Reddy GP, Chernoff DM, Siripornpitak S, Adams JR, Outtrim RA, Higgins CB. Assessment of coronary artery stenoses with contrast-enhanced electron-beam CT and axial reconstructions. Radiology 1997;205:Suppl:459. abstract.
Return to Text
25. Achenbach S, Moshage W, Bachmann K. Detection of high-grade restenosis after PTCA using contrast-enhanced electron beam CT. Circulation 1997;96:2785-8.
Return to Text
26. Boyd D, Gould RG, Quinn J, Sparks R, Stanley R, Hermannsfeldt W. A proposed cardiac 3-d densitometer for easy detection and evaluation of heart disase. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1979;26:2724-7.
Return to Text
27. Gould RG. Principles of ultrafast computed tomography: historical aspects, mechanism of action, and scanner characteristics. In: Stanford W, Rumberger JA, eds. Ultrafast computed tomography in cardiac imaging: principles and practice. Mount Kisco, N.Y.: Futura Publishing, 1992:1-16.
Return to Text
28. Stanford W, Thompson BH, Weiss RM. Coronary artery calcification: clinical significance and current methods of detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;161:1139-46.
Return to Text
29. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975;51:Suppl:5-40.
Return to Text
30. Cohen J. A coefficient for agreement on nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:37-46.
Return to Text
31. Rumberger JA. Quantifying left ventricular regional and global systolic function using ultrafast computed tomography. Am J Cardiac Imaging 1991;5:29-37.
Return to Text
32. Manning WJ, Li W, Edelman RR. A preliminary report comparing magnetic resonance coronary angiography with conventional angiography. N Engl J Med 1993;328:828-32. [Erratum, N Engl J Med 1994;330:152.]
Return to Text
33. Post JC, van Rossum AC, Hofman MB, Valk J, Visser CA. Three-dimensional respiratory-gated MR angiography of coronary arteries: comparison with conventional coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:1399-404.
Return to Text
34. Pennell DJ, Bogren HG, Keegan J, Firmin DN, Underwood SR. Assessment of coronary artery stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Heart 1996;75:127-33.
Return to Text
35. Mohiaddin RH, Bogren HG, Lazim F, et al. Magnetic resonance coronary angiography in heart transplant recipients. Coron Artery Dis 1996;7:591-7.
Return to Text
36. Kessler W, Achenbach S, Moshage W, et al. Usefulness of respiratory gated magnetic resonance coronary angiography in assessing narrowings>or = 50% in diameter in native coronary arteries and in aortocoronary bypass conduits. Am J Cardiol 1997;80:989-93.
Return to Text
37. Muller MF, Fleisch M, Kroeker R, Chatterjee T, Meier B, Vock P. Proximal coronary artery stenosis: three-dimensional MRI with fat saturation and navigator echo. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:644-51.
Return to Text
38. McConnell MV, Ganz P, Selwyn AP, Li W, Edelman RR, Manning WJ. Identification of anomalous coronary arteries and their anatomic course by magnetic resonance coronary angiography. Circulation 1995;92:3158-62.
Return to Text
39. Post JC, van Rossum AC, Bronzwaer JGF, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of anomalous coronary arteries: a new gold standard for delineating the proximal course? Circulation 1995;92:3163-71.
Return to Text
40. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology, Association of European Paediatric Cardiologists. The clinical role of magnetic resonance in cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J 1998;19:19-39.
Return to Text
41. Duerinckx AJ. MR angiography of the coronary arteries. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1995;7:267-85.
Return to Text
42. Johnson LW, Lozner EC, Johnson S, et al. Coronary arteriography 1984-1987: a report of the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. I. Results and complications. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989;17:5-10.
Return to Text
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Related Editorial
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright © 1998 by the Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
References1. 1993 Heart and stroke facts statistics. Dallas: American Heart Association, 1993:8.
Return to Text
2. Hozumi T, Yoshida K, Ogata Y, et al. Noninvasive assessment of significant left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis by coronary flow velocity reserve with transthoracic color Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 1998;97:1557-62.
Return to Text
3. Feigenbaum H. Transthoracic ultrasonic visualization of coronary atherosclerosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989;2:253-8.
Return to Text
4. Tardif JC, Vannan MA, Taylor K, Schwartz SL, Pandian NG. Delineation of extended lengths of coronary arteries by multiplane transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:909-19.
Return to Text
5. Caiati C, Aragona P, Iliceto S, Rizzon P. Improved detection of proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis after intravenous injection of a lung-crossing contrast agent: a transesophageal Doppler echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:1413-21.
Return to Text
6. Mulvagh SL, Foley DA, Aeschbacher BC, Klarich KK, Seward JB. Second harmonic imaging of an intravenously administered echocardiographic contrast agent: visualization of coronary arteries and measurement of coronary blood flow. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:1519-25.
Return to Text
7. Rubenstein E, Brown GS, Chapman D, et al. Synchrotron radiation coronary angiography in humans. In: Chance B, Deisenhofer J, Ebashi S, et al., eds. Synchrotron radiation in the biosciences. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994:639-50.
Return to Text
8. Hamm CW, Meinertz T, Dix WR, et al. Intravenous coronary angiography with dichromography using synchrotron radiation. Herz 1996;21:127-31.
Return to Text
9. Manning WJ, Edelman RR. Magnetic resonance coronary angiography. Magn Reson Q 1993;9:131-51.
Return to Text
10. Taylor AM, Pennell DJ. Recent advances in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Curr Opin Cardiol 1996;11:635-42.
Return to Text
11. van der Wall EE, van Rugge FP, Vliegen HW, Reiber JH, de Roos A, Bruschke AV. Ischemic heart disease: value of MR techniques. Int J Card Imaging 1997;13:79-89.
Return to Text
12. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:827-32.
Return to Text
13. Ultrafast CT for coronary calcification. Lancet 1991;337:1449-50.
Return to Text
14. Breen JF, Sheedy PF II, Schwartz RS, et al. Coronary artery calcification detected with ultrafast CT as an indication of coronary artery disease. Radiology 1992;185:435-9.
Return to Text
15. Budoff MJ, Georgiou D, Brody A, et al. Ultrafast computed tomography as a diagnostic modality in the detection of coronary artery disease: a multicenter study. Circulation 1996;93:898-904.
Return to Text
16. Arad Y, Spadaro LA, Goodman K, et al. Predictive value of electron beam computed tomography of the coronary arteries: 19-month follow-up of 1173 asymptomatic subjects. Circulation 1996;93:1951-3.
Return to Text
17. Detrano R, Hsiai T, Wang S, et al. Prognostic value of coronary calcification and angiographic stenoses in patients undergoing coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:285-90.
Return to Text
18. Rumberger JA, Sheedy PF II, Breen JF, Fitzpatrick LA, Schwartz RS. Electron beam computed tomography and coronary artery disease: scanning for coronary artery calcification. Mayo Clin Proc 1996;7:369-77.
Return to Text
19. Moshage WE, Achenbach S, Seese B, Bachmann K, Kirchgeorg M. Coronary artery stenoses: three-dimensional imaging with electrocardiographically triggered, contrast agent-enhanced, electron-beam CT. Radiology 1995;196:707-14.
Return to Text
20. Chernoff DM, Ritchie CJ, Higgins CB. Evaluation of electron beam CT coronary angiography in healthy subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:93-9.
Return to Text
21. Budoff MJ, Oudiz RJ, Zalace CP, et al. Intravenous three dimensional coronary angiography using contrast enhanced electron beam computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:Suppl A:393A. abstract.
Return to Text
22. Nakanishi T, Ito K, Imazu M, Yamakido M. Evaluation of coronary artery stenoses using electron-beam CT and multiplanar reformation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21:121-7.
Return to Text
23. Schmermund A, Rensing BJ, Sheedy PF, Bell MR, Rumberger JA. Intravenous electron-beam computed tomographic coronary angiography for segmental analysis of coronary artery stenoses. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:1547-54.
Return to Text
24. Reddy GP, Chernoff DM, Siripornpitak S, Adams JR, Outtrim RA, Higgins CB. Assessment of coronary artery stenoses with contrast-enhanced electron-beam CT and axial reconstructions. Radiology 1997;205:Suppl:459. abstract.
Return to Text
25. Achenbach S, Moshage W, Bachmann K. Detection of high-grade restenosis after PTCA using contrast-enhanced electron beam CT. Circulation 1997;96:2785-8.
Return to Text
26. Boyd D, Gould RG, Quinn J, Sparks R, Stanley R, Hermannsfeldt W. A proposed cardiac 3-d densitometer for easy detection and evaluation of heart disase. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1979;26:2724-7.
Ret
Herz 21: 106-117, (1996)
Darstellung der Koronararterien mittels Elektronenstrahltomographie
Achenbach S, Moshage W, Bachmann K
Erlangen
ZUSAMMENFASSUNG:
Unter den nichtinvasiven Verfahren zur bildgebenden Diagnostik des Herzens hebt sich die Elektronenstrahltomographie (EBT, "ultraschnelles CT"), ein dem herkömmlichen CT verwandtes Verfahren, durch extrem hohe räumliche und zeitliche Auflösung hervor. Sie ist damit zur Darstellung der Koronararterien geeignet. Wir entwickelten ein Protokoll zur nichtinvasiven Koronarangiographie mittels EBT. Die Arbeit schildert die Methodik und erhaltenen Ergebnisse dieses neuen Verfahrens.
Bisher wurden 88 nichtselektionierte Patienten bei Verdacht auf bzw. bekannter koronarer Herzerkrankung mittels EBT untersucht. Bei zwölf Patienten bestand ein Zustand nach aortokoronarer Bypass-Operation mit insgesamt 28 Bypasses. Bei neun Patienten wurde das EBT am Tag nach Angioplastie einer hochgradigen Koronararterienstenose wiederholt. Die Untersuchungen wurden mit einem Evolution® Scanner durchgeführt. Verwendet wurde eine Bildmatrix von 512 x 512 Pixeln bei einem Field of view von 15 cm (entsprechend einer Pixelgröße unter 0,1 mm2) und einer Schichtdicke von 3 mm. Alle Aufnahmen wurden EKG-getriggert diastolisch angefertigt. Das Untersuchungsprotokoll bestand aus drei Stufen:
1. Lokalisierung der Herzposition,
2. Bestimmung der Transitzeit des Kontrastmittels nach peripher-venöser Injektion bis zum Dichteanstieg in den Koronararterien (Abbildung 2),
3. Aufnahme des 3D-Volumendatensatzes in 40 axialen Schnittbildern des Herzens (3 mm Schichtdicke mit 1 mm Überlappung) nach peripher-venöser Injektion von 120 bis 160 ml Kontrastmittel (Fluß: 4 ml/s).
Zur Auswertung wurden 3D-Rekonstruktionen des Herzens und der isolierten Koronararterien in Shaded-surface-display-Technik und als Maximum intensity projection angefertigt. Ein unterer Schwellenwert von 80 HU diente der selektiven Darstellung des kontrastmittelgefüllten Gefäßinnenlumens. Die Ergebnisse wurden mit den konventionellen, selektiven Angiogrammen der Patienten verglichen. Nach entsprechender Editierung (Abbildungen 3a bis 3e) gelang bei 90% der Patienten die zur Beurteilung ausreichende Darstellung der proximalen und mittleren Abschnitte der Herzkranzgefäße, wobei die Bildqualität im Bereich des Ramus interventricularis anterior derjenigen der rechten Koronararterie und des Ramus circumflexus deutlich überlegen war. In etwa 10% der Fälle war die Qualität der rekonstruierten Bilder zur Beurteilung nicht ausreichend. Der verminderten Bildqualität lagen Atemartefakte sowie schnellere Eigenbewegungen der rechten Koronararterie und des Ramus circumflexus zugrunde (Abbildungen 8a bis 8d). In einer Subanalyse von 30 Patienten, deren EBT-Rekonstruktionen mit der quantitativen Koronarangiographie verglichen wurden, korrelierten die Gefäßdurchmesser des EBT und der quantitativen Koronarangiographie mit einem Korrelationskoeffizienten von 0,82, im Bereich des Ramus interventricularis anterior mit 0,87. 12/14 hochgradige Stenosen und 5/5 Verschlüsse im proximalen und mittleren Ramus interventricularis anterior wurden mittels EBT korrekt diagnostiziert (Abbildungen 5 und 6). Bei verringerter Bildqualität aufgrund von Bewegungsartefakten und Überlagerung durch venöse Gefäße gelang die korrekte Diagnose von 3/4 hochgradigen Stenosen und 1/2 Verschlüssen der rechten Koronararterie und 2/4 hochgradigen Stenosen des Ramus circumflexus. Nach perkutaner transluminaler koronarer Angioplastie (PTCA) ließ sich bei allen neun wiederholt untersuchten Patienten der Interventionserfolg im EBT nachweisen (Abbildungen 7a und 7b).
Unter den 28 Bypasses ließ sich ein Mammaria-Bypass zum Ramus interventricularis anterior zwar darstellen, aufgrund des kleinen Gefäßlumens und begleitender Metallartefakte durch Gefäßclips jedoch nicht auf das Vorliegen von Stenosen beurteilen. Von den 27 Venenbypässen stellten sich 20 im EBT wie im Angiogramm unauffällig dar, übereinstimmend zeigten sich sechs Bypasses verschlossen, ein Bypass hochgradig proximal stenosiert (Abbildung 9).
Die Elektronenstrahltomographie mit intravenöser Kontrastmittelapplikation erlaubt als nichtinvasives Verfahren die Darstellung von Koronargefäßen und aortokoronaren Bypasses sowie die Beurteilung von Stenosen. Bei sehr guter Darstellung des Ramus interventricularis anterior ist die Bildqualität des Ramus circumflexus und der rechten Koronararterie eingeschränkt. Im Vergleich zur konkurrierenden Kernspintomographie zeigt das EBT eine wesentlich höhere räumliche Auflösung und deutlich kürzere Akquisitionszeiten. Eine klinische Anwendung kann sich bereits kurzfristig für nichtinvasive Kontrolluntersuchungen zur Erkennung von Rezidivstenosen nach koronaren Interventionen ergeben.
für die Verfasser:
Dr. S. Achenbach
Medizinische Klinik II mit Poliklinik der Universität
Östliche Stadtmauerstr. 29
D-91054 Erlangen
Herz 21: 118-126, (1996)
Bedeutung koronarer Kalkablagerungen. Diagnostik mittels Elektronenstrahltomographie
Schmermund A, Baumgart D, Görge G, Seibel R, Grönemeyer D, Erbel R
Essen und Mülheim
ZUSAMMENFASSUNG:
Die koronare Herzkrankheit (KHK) ist eine der häufigsten Ursachen von Krankheit und Tod in den westlichen Industriestaaten. Kürzlich durchgeführte Studien zeigen, daß eine erfolgreiche Primär- und Sekundärprävention mit dem Einsatz von Cholesterinsynthese-Inhibitoren möglich ist. Die Diagnose der koronaren Herzkrankheit bleibt aber insbesondere in den frühen Stadien der Erkrankung schwierig. Während die konventionelle Risikoanalyse und derzeit etablierte Belastungstests wenig sensitiv und spezifisch sind, ermöglicht die Untersuchung von koronaren Kalkablagerungen den direkten Nachweis einer koronaren Atherosklerose. Koronare Kalkablagerungen sind regelhaft Ausdruck einer koronaren Atherosklerose. Die Diagnose koronarer Kalkablagerungen gelingt mittels Durchleuchtung und konventioneller Computertomographie, obwohl beide Methoden mit erheblichen Limitationen behaftet sind. Eine exakte Lokalisation und Quantifizierung koronarer Kalkablagerungen ist erst mit der seit wenigen Jahren klinisch eingesetzten Elektronenstrahltomographie (EBT) möglich geworden. Mit dieser Methode wurde gezeigt, daß koronare Kalkablagerungen in der asymptomatischen Bevölkerung weit verbreitet sind. Normalwerte der EBT-Untersuchung wurden anhand eines standardisierten "Kalzium-Scores" ermittelt. Der EBT-Kalzium-Score liegt bei Personen mit bekannter koronarer Herzkrankheit deutlich über den Werten bei Personen ohne bekannte koronare Herzkrankheit. Die Sensitivität der Untersuchung in der Aufdeckung früher koronarer Herzkrankheit-Stadien übertrifft Risikoanalyse und Belastungstests. Eine angiographisch signifikante koronare Herzkrankheit kann jedoch nicht mit ausreichender Spezifität diagnostiziert werden. Es fand sich eine enge Korrelation der im EBT dargestellten koronaren Kalkablagerungen a) zum Ausmaß des histopathologisch bestimmten koronaren Plaquevolumens, b) zu intrakoronaren Ultraschallbefunden, c) zur Anzahl der koronaren Risikofaktoren und d) zur koronaren Prognose. Eine zuverlässige Identifikation koronar gefährdeter Personen ist erstmals nichtinvasiv möglich geworden. Richtlinien zur Anwendung der EBT im Rahmen der Früherkennung und Prävention der koronaren Herzkrankheit werden zur Zeit erarbeitet
für die Verfasser:
Dr. med. Axel Schmermund
Abteilung für Kardiologie
Universitätsklinikum GHS
Hufelandstr. 55
D-45122 Essen
Zusammenfassung und Kommentar:
Sechtem U, Stuttgart Vergleich von EBT und IVUS in der Koronardiagnostik
Comparison of Electron-Beam Computed Tomography and Intracoronary Ultrasound in Detecting Calcified and Noncalcified Plaques in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes and No or Minimal to Moderate Angiographic Coronary Artery Disease
Schmermund A, Baumgart D, Adamzik M, Ge J, Grönemeyer D, Seibel R, Sehnert C, Görge G, Haude M, Erbel R.
Am J Cardiol 1998; 81: 141-6
Die Bedeutung der Elektronenstrahl-Computertomographie (electron beam computed tomography = EBCT) hat in den letzten Jahren zugenommen, da die frühzeitige Erkennung und die Quantifizierung von Koronarverkalkungen klinisch immer interessanter werden. EBCT liefert eine Serie transaxialer Bilder des Herzens, die eine hervorragende räumliche und zeitliche Auflösung haben. Autoptische Untersuchungen zeigen, daß das Ausmaß der Koronarverkalkungen mit dem Ausmaß der Plaquebelastung der Koronararterien korreliert (1). Der Kalzium-Score, der sich aus EBCT-Bildern errechnen läßt, korreliert mit der Wahrscheinlichkeit, daß eine höhergradige Koronarstenose vorliegt (2). Entsprechend hat eine EBCT-Untersuchung, bei der sich kein Koronarkalk findet, einen hohen negativen Vorhersagewert und schließt höhergradige Koronarstenosen weitgehend aus. Es ist allerdings bekannt, daß atherosklerotische Plaques, die keine Verkalkungen enthalten, im EBCT übersehen werden können. Solche Plaques finden sich gehäuft bei jüngeren Patienten mit instabilen Koronarsyndromen. Trotz der prinzipiellen Möglichkeit, die Koronarstenose selbst aufgrund der intraluminalen Kontrastmittelaussparung bei einer 3-dimensionalen Rekonstruktion der 3mm dicken EBCT-Schichten zu entdecken (3), ist diese Methode zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt noch nicht klinisch praktikabel, da die Rekonstruktion nicht voll automatisch erfolgen kann.
Die Arbeitsgruppe um Erbel hat daher den Stellenwert der EBCT bei Patienten mit akuten Koronarsyndromen untersucht und die EBCT-Ergebnisse mit denen der Koronarangiographie verglichen (4). Bei Patienten mit Durchmesser-Stenosen von weniger als 50% wurde darüber hinaus eine intrakoronare Ultraschalluntersuchung durchgeführt und mit den EBCT-Resultaten verglichen. Bei den 118 konsekutiven Patienten mit kurz zurückliegendem Myokardinfarkt (n = 101) oder instabiler Angina (n = 17) fanden sich angiographisch bei 110 Patienten höhergradige Stenosierungen von mehr als 50%. 105 dieser 110 Patienten (96%) zeigten Verkalkungen im EBCT. Bei den 8 Patienten, die angiographisch unauffällig waren oder lediglich leichte Lumenirregularitäten aufwiesen (bei diesen Patienten wurde das Vorhandensein von nicht verkalkten Plaques mittels intrakoronarem Ultraschall verifiziert), war das EBCT lediglich in einem Fall (13%) pathologisch. Die 7 Patienten mit akuten Koronarsyndromen und unauffälligem EBCT waren signifikant jünger und rauchten signifikant häufiger (4).
Diese initial bei einer kleinen Zahl von Patienten gemachten Beobachtungen wurden in der jetzt vorliegenden Arbeit von Schmermund et al. auf 40 konsekutive Patienten mit akuten Koronarsyndromen und fehlenden oder minimalen koronarangiographischen Befunden erweitert. 7 Patienten hatten Einzelläsionen mit einem Stenosegrad von 50 - 60%, 19 Patienten zeigten angiographisch lediglich geringe Wandunregelmäßigkeiten und bei 14 Patienten war das Angiogramm völlig normal. Bei allen Patienten wurde eine intrakoronare Ultraschalluntersuchung durchgeführt. Von den 95 Segmenten bei 36 Patienten, bei denen mit intrakoronarem Ultraschall Plaques gefunden wurden, waren 61 verkalkt und 34 nicht verkalkt. Von den 36 Patienten mit im intrakoronaren Ultraschall sichtbaren Plaques wiesen 27 Patienten (75%) zumindest 1 Segment mit Verkalkungen im EBCT auf. Abb. 1 zeigt die Beziehung zwischen der Gesamtzahl von Segmenten mit Verkalkungen im EBCT und der Gesamtzahl von Koronarsegmenten mit Plaques (verkalkt und nicht verkalkt) im intrakoronaren Ultraschall. Man sieht, daß auch bei Patienten mit angiographisch weitgehend unauffälligem Befund zwischen dem Ausmaß der Verkalkungen im EBCT und der Plaquebelastung eine lineare Korrelation besteht. Dieser Befund erklärt, warum der Kalzium-Score im EBCT prognostische Bedeutung hat (5). Zusätzlich zu der Zahl hochgradiger Stenosen bestimmt nämlich vor allem das Ausmaß diffuser atherosklerotischer Veränderungen in den Koronararterien die Prognose des Patienten (6).
Ein weiterer wichtiger Befund in der aktuellen Untersuchung von Schmermund ist, daß in dieser speziellen Patientengruppe lediglich 1/3 der Patienten (13 von 40) ein unauffälliges EBCT hatten. Das bedeutet, daß 2/3 der Patienten, die trotz fehlender höhergradiger Stenosen gefährdet sind, akute Koronarsyndrome zu erleiden, mit EBCT frühzeitig erkannt werden könnten und einer entsprechenden präventiven Behandlung zugeführt werden könnten. Aus den Daten von Schmermund et al. wird aber auch klar, daß nicht alle Patienten rechtzeitig mit einem EBCT-Screening entdeckt werden könnten. Von diesen 13 Patienten hatten allerdings 4 Patienten auch im intrakoronaren Ultraschall keine Plaques, so daß bei diesen Patienten von einer nicht koronaren Ursache der akuten thorakalen Beschwerden ausgegangen werden muß. Wenn man dies berücksichtigt, bleiben lediglich 25% der Patienten (9 von 36), bei denen die atherosklerotische Erkrankung der Koronararterien mit dem ihr innewohnenden Risiko nicht frühzeitig mit EBCT hätte erkannt werden können. Patienten mit wenig verkalkten Plaques fanden sich in Übereinstimmung mit der oben zitierten Arbeit von 1997 bei jungen aktiven Rauchern, Patienten mit höherem LDL-Spiegel und Diabetikern (Abb. 2). Es wird weiteren Untersuchungen vorbehalten bleiben, wie man bei der Entscheidung, primär präventiv tätig zu werden, diese Risikofaktoren bei Patienten mit unauffälligem EBCT berücksichtigen soll.
Obwohl in der Arbeit von Schmermund et al. nicht alle Koronararterien mit intrakoronarem Ultraschall untersucht werden konnten und auch keine Aussage über die "culprit lesion", die für das akute Koronarsyndrom verantwortlich war, gemacht wurde, sind die mitgeteilten Beobachtungen wichtig für die Beurteilung des Stellenwertes der EBCT beim Screening von asymptomatischen Patienten mit Risikofaktoren. Der komplexe Zusammenhang zwischen dem Cholesterin-Spiegel und der erzielbaren Risikoreduktion sowohl für die Sekundär- als auch für die Primärprävention (7) macht es notwendig, mit Hilfe anderer Parameter die kostspielige lipidsenkende Therapie für die Patienten zu reservieren, die am meisten profitieren können. Die Arbeit von Schmermund et al. zeigt, daß das EBCT hier eine wesentliche Rolle spielen kann, da Patienten mit "normalen" Cholesterinspiegeln und fehlenden Koronarstenosen trotzdem Verkalkungen im EBCT haben können und damit frühzeitig als behandlungsbedürftige Risikopatienten identifiziert werden könnten.
Literatur:
: Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D, Nossen J, Daniel WG.:
Value of electron-beam computed tomography for the noninvasive detection of high-grade coronary-artery stenoses and occlusions. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1964-1971
Brandt-Pohlmann M, Achenbach S, Pongratz G, Moshage W, Wortmann A. Non-invasive diagnosis of a congenital coronary artery fistula. Int J Card Imaging 1998;14:211-214
Seese B, Brandt-Pohlmann M, Moshage W, Achenbach S, Schwarz T, Bachmann K. :
Evaluation of the association between coronary calcification detected by electron beam computed tomography and atherosclerosis of extracranial carotid arteries in vivo.
Int J Angiol 1998;7:301-306
Moshage W, Achenbach S, Bachmann K.:
Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Elektronenstrahltomographie.
Z Kardiol 1998;87:522-527
Nossen J, Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D, Daniel WG. Auswirkungen des Triggerzeitpunktes auf Nachweis und Quantifizierung von Koronarkalk mittels Elektronenstrahltomographie. Biomed Techn 1998;43(Suppl. 1):50
Achenbach S, Moshage W, Bachmann K.:
Noninvasive coronary angiography by contrast-enhanced electron beam computed tomography. Clin Cardiol 1998;21:323-330
Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D, Bachmann K. :
Curved multiplanar reconstructions for the evaluation of contrast-enhanced electron beam CT of the coronary arteries.
Am J Roentgenol 1998;170(4):895-899
Achenbach S, Moshage W, Bachmann K. Detection of high-grade restenosis after PTCA using contrast-enhanced electron beam CT. Circulation 1997; 90:2785-2788
Achenbach S, Kessler W, Moshage W, Ropers D, Zink D, Kroeker R, Nitz W, Laub G, Bachmann K. Visualization of the coronary arteries in three-dimensional reconstructions using respiratory gated magnetic resonance imaging. Coronary Artery Disease 1997:8;441-448
Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D, Nossen J, Bachmann K. Non-invasive coronary angiography by electron beam tomography: methods and clinical evaluation in the follow-up after PTCA. Z Kardiol 1997;86:121-130
Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D, Nossen J, Bachmann K. Noninvasive, three-dimensional visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts by electron beam tomography. Am J Cardiol 1997;79:856-861
Seese B, Moshage W, Achenbach S, Bachmann K, Kirchgeorg M. Possibilities of electron beam tomography in nonvasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a comparison between quantity of coronary calcification and angiographic findings. Int J Angiology 1997;6:124-129
Ropers D, Achenbach S, Moshage W, Nossen J, Bachmann K. Quantitative Analyse der Gefäßdiameter in der Koronararteriendarstellung mittels Elektronenstrahltomographie: Phantomstudien und Vergleich zur quantitativen Koronarangiographie. Biomed Technik 1997;42(Suppl II):251-252
Moshage W, Achenbach S, Seese B, Bachmann K. Nichtinvasive Koronardiagnostik mittels EBT. Fortschr Med 1997;115:45-49
Achenbach S, Moshage W, Bachmann K. Coronary angiography by electron beam tomography. Herz 1996;21:106-117
Janßen G, Kretschmer S, Achenbach S, von der Emde J, Moshage W, Bachmann K:. Posttraumatisches Aneurysma spurium des rechten Vorhofes. Z Kardiol 1996;85:351-356
Moshage W, Achenbach S, Seese B, Bachmann K, Kirchgeorg M. Coronary artery stenoses: Three-dimensional imaging with electrocardiographically triggered, contrast agent-enhanced, electron beam CT. Radiology 1995;196:707-714
Achenbach S, Moshage W, Seese B, Bachmann K, Kirchgeorg M. A method for 3-dimensional coronary angiography by contrast-enhanced electron beam tomography (EBT). Biomed Tech 1995;40(Suppl I):17-20
Seese B, Moshage W, Achenbach S, Bachmann K, Kirchgeorg M. Evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction - a comparison of electron beam tomography and angiocardiography. Biomed Technik 1995;40(Suppl I):219-220
Seese B, Moshage W, Achenbach S, Bachmann K, Engels G, Hach G, Weber P. Coronary Artery Calcification as a Marker for Coronary Artery Disease. Biomed Technik 1994;39(Suppl):207-208